4.8 Article

The role of biosilica in the osteoprotegerin/RANKL ratio in human osteoblast-like cells

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 30, Pages 7716-7725

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.002

Keywords

Biosilica; Silicatein; Osteoporosis; Osteoprotegerin; SaOS-2; Receptor activator for NF-kappa B ligand

Funding

  1. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Schr 277/10-1]
  3. International Human Frontier Science Program
  4. European Commission [031541 - BIO-LITHO]
  5. BiomaTiCS consortium of the Mainz University Medical Center
  6. International S & T Cooperation Program of China [2008DFA00980]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earlier studies have demonstrated that biosilica, synthesized by the enzyme silicatein, induces hydroxyapatite formation in osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. Here we study the effect of biosilica on the expressions of osteoprotegerin [OPG] and the receptor activator for NF-kappa B ligand [RANKL] in the SaOS-2 cell model. We show that during growth of SaOS-2 cells on biosiliceous matrices hydroxyapatite formation is induced, while syntheses of cartilaginous proteoglycans and sulfated glycosaminoglycans are down-regulated. Furthermore, quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed a strong time-depended increase in expression of OPG in biosilica exposed SaOS-2 cells while the steady-state expression level of RANKL remained unchanged. These results have been corroborated on the protein level by ELISA assays. Therefore, we propose that biosilica stimulated OPG synthesis in osteoblast-like cells counteracts those pathways that control RANKL expression and function (e.g. maturation of pre-osteoclasts and activation of osteoclasts). Hence, the data obtained in the present study reveal the considerable biomedical potential of biosilica for treatment and prophylaxis of osteoporotic disorders. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available