4.4 Article

The spectrum of the night sky over Mount Hopkins and Kitt Peak: Changes after a decade

Journal

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/316552

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent (1998-1999) absolute spectrophotometry of the night sky over two southern Arizona astronomical sites, Kitt Peak and Mount Hopkins, is compared to similar data obtained in 1988 at each site. The current zenith sky brightness in the range similar to 3700-6700 Angstrom is essentially identical at the two sites and is as dark now as Palomar Observatory was in the early 1970s, when it was generally considered a premier dark observing site. Converted to broadband measurements, our spectrophotometry is equivalent to B = 22.63, V = 21.45 mag arcsec(-2), for the zenith night sky. The contribution of high-pressure sodium street lights to broadband V is about 0.2 mag arcsec(-2), comparable to the strong airglow O I lambda 5577 line. During the period from 1988 to 1998-1999, the zenith sky brightness increased only modestly, with the largest changes being seen for Kitt Peak, where the zenith sky has brightened by approximate to 0.1-0.2 mag arcsec(-2) in the blue-optical region. For Kitt Peak we also have both 1988 and 1999 observations at modestly large zenith distances (ZD approximate to 60 degrees). In the directions away from Tucson, the sky has brightened by approximate to 0.35 mag arcsec(-2) over the intervening decade. Toward Tucson the change has been larger, approximately 0.5 mag arcsec(-2). In most directions the increase in the sky brightness has lagged behind the fractional increase in population growth, which we attribute to good outdoor lighting ordinances, a fact which is further reflected in the decrease in Hg emission. However? our results emphasize the need for diligent attention as developments creep closer to our observing sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available