4.8 Article

Hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol and CO on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3: Is there a common intermediate or not?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages 43-48

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.016

Keywords

H/D substitution; Methanol; Copper; Reverse water gas shift; DFT; Kinetics; Mechanism; CO2 hydrogenation

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BE4767/1-1]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

H/D exchange experiments on a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst have shown that methanol synthesis and RWGS display a strong thermodynamic isotope effect, which is attributed to differences in the zero-point energy of hydrogenated vs. deuterated species. The effect is larger for methanol synthesis and substantially increases the equilibrium yield in deuterated syngas. In the kinetic regime of CO2 hydrogenation, an inverse kinetic isotope effect of H/D substitution was observed, which is stronger for methanol synthesis than for CO formation suggesting that the two reactions do not share a common intermediate. Similar observations were also made on other catalysts such as Cu/MgO, Cu/SiO2, and Pd/SiO2. In contrast to CO2 hydrogenation, the CO hydrogenation on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 did not show such a strong kinetic isotope effect indicating that methanol formation from CO2 does not proceed via consecutive reverse water gas shift and CO hydrogenation steps. The inverse KIE is consistent with formate hydrogenation being the rate-determining step of methanol synthesis from CO2. Differences in the extent of product inhibition by water, observed for methanol synthesis and reverse water gas shift indicate that the two reactions proceed on different surface sites in a parallel manner. The consequences for catalyst design for effective methanol synthesis from CO2 are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available