4.8 Article

The quantitative detection of total HER2 load by quantum dots and the identification of a new subtype of breast cancer with different 5-year prognosis

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 33, Pages 8818-8825

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.091

Keywords

Quantum dots; Breast carcinoma; HER2; Tumor heterogeneity; Quantitative determination; Survival analysis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of China [NCET-04-0669]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [20833006]
  3. Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [20921062]
  4. National Key Scientific Program (973)-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology [2006CB933100]
  5. Ministry of Public Health [2009ZX10004-107, 2008ZX10004-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate classification is fundamental for breast cancer (BC) personalized care. Current BC classification based on the either traditional morphological staging or molecular signatures seems inefficient to reveal the true behaviors of invasive BC evolution. An appropriate approach combining the macro- and micro-pathologic information might be more useful academically as well as clinically. Here we explore a holistic approach by integrating a key molecular prognostic indicator of BC, HER2, with quantitative determination using quantum dots (QDs)-based nanotechnology and spectral analysis, and a key macro-pathologic indicator, tumor size, resulting a new indicator, total HER2 load. This indicator might better reveal BC heterogeneity and new subtypes of BC with different 5-year disease-free survival compared with current methods, which could be helpful in formulating a more personalized targeted therapy for BC. Furthermore, this mode integrating macro- and micro-pathological indicators might help gain new insights into invasive BC biological behaviors. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available