4.7 Article

Archean granitoids at the contact of Eastern Ghat Granulite Belt and Singhbhum-Orissa craton, in Bhuban-Rengali sector, Orissa, India

Journal

GONDWANA RESEARCH
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 205-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70097-6

Keywords

granite; geochronology; Pb-Pb; Rb-Sr; Eastern Ghat Granulite Belt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The small granite plutons occurring at the contact of the Singhbhum-Orissa Iron Ore craton (IOC) to the north and the Eastern Ghat Granulite Belt (EGGB) to the south in eastern Indian shield are characterised by the presence of enclaves of the granulites of EGGB and the greenschist facies rocks of IOC. These granites also bear the imprints of later cataclastic deformation which is present at the contact of the IOC and the EGGB. In situ Pb-Pb zircon dating of these granites gives minimum age of their formation similar to 2.80 Ga. A whole-rock three point Rb-Sr isochron age of this rock is found to be similar to 2.90 Ga. Therefore, the true age of formation of these granites will be around 2.90-2.80 Ga. These,granitic rocks also contain xenocrystic zircon components of similar to 3.50 Ga and show a later metasomatic or metamorphic effect 2.48 Ga obtained from the analyses on overgrowths developed on 2.80 Ga old zircon cores. The presence of granulitic enclaves within these contact zone granite indicates that the granulite facies metamorphism of the EGGB is similar to 2.80 Ca or still older in age. The cataclastic deformations observed at the contact zone of the two adjacent cratons is definitely younger than 2.80 Ga and possibly related to 2.48 Ga event observed from the overgrowths. As 2.80 Ga granite plutons of small dimensions are also observed at the western margin of the IOC; it can be concluded that a geologic event occurred similar to 2.80 Ga over the IOC when small granite bodies evolved at the marginal part of this craton after its stabilisation at similar to 3.09 Ga.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available