4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Connexins and gap junctions of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the CNS

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 29-44

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00066-1

Keywords

connexin; gap junction; glial cell; astrocyte; oligodendrocyte; brain and spinal cord; intercellular communication; electron microscopy; freeze-fracture; immunocytochemistry; immunogold labelling

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-31027] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article summarizes early and recent literature on the structure, distribution and composition of gap junctions between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, and the differential expression of glial connexins in adult and developing mammalian CNS. In addition to an overview of the topic, discussion is focused on the organization of homologous gap junctional interactions between astrocytes and between oligodendrocytes as well as on heterologous junctional coupling between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. The homotypic and heterotypic nature of these gap junctions is related to the connexins known to be produced by glial cells in the intact brain and spinal cord. Emphasis is placed on the ultrastructural level of analysis required to attribute gap junction and connexin deployment to particular cell types and subcellular locations. Our aim is to provide a firm basis for consideration of anticipated rapid advances in understanding of structural relationships of gap junctions and connexins within the glial gap junctional syncytium. Conclusions tb date suggest that the glial syncytium is more complex than previously appreciated and that glial pathways of junctional communication may not only be determined by the presence of gap junctions, but also by the connexin composition and conductance regulation of junctional channels. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available