4.8 Article

The influence of RGD-bearing hydrogels on the re-expression of contractile vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 25, Pages 4127-4135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.038

Keywords

Smooth muscle cell; Arterial tissue engineering; Hydrogel; Scaffold; Vascular graft

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [5R01EB002067]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R01HL087843]
  3. NIH [T32GM07250]
  4. American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship [07154228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the ability of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogel scaffolds with pendant integrin-binding GRGDSP peptides (RGD-gels) to support the re-differentiation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) toward a contractile phenotype. Human coronary artery SMCS were seeded on RGD-gels, hydrogels with other extracellular matrix derived peptides, fibronectin (FN) and laminin (LN). Differentiation was induced on RGD-gels with low serum medium containing soluble heparin, and the differentiation status was monitored by mRNA expression, protein expression, and intracellular protein organization of the contractile smooth muscle markers, smooth muscle a-actin, calponin, and SM-22 alpha. RGD-gels supported a rapid induction (2.7- to 25-fold up-regulation) of SMC marker gene mRNA, with expression levels that were equivalent to FN and LN controls. Marker protein levels mirrored the changes in mRNA expression, with levels on RGD-gels indistinguishable from FN and LN controls. Furthermore, these markers co-localized in stress fibers within SMCs on RGD-gels suggesting the recapitulation of a contractile apparatus within the cells. These results indicate that SMCs cultured on RGD-bearing hydrogels can re-differentiate toward a contractile phenotype suggesting this material is an excellent candidate for further development as a bioactive scaffold that regulates SMC phenotype. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available