4.8 Article

Acellularization of embryoid bodies via physical disruption methods

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 1143-1149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.001

Keywords

Acellularization; Decellularization; Embryoid bodies; Extracellular matrix; Embryonic stem cells; Differentiation

Funding

  1. Georgia Tech/Emory Center for the Engineering of Living Tissues [EEC-9731463]
  2. NIH [R21 EB007316, GM008433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Embryonic stern cells (ESCs) are capable of differentiating into all somatic cell types and have therefore attracted significant interest for use in tissue repair and regeneration therapies. Transplanted ESCs can not only integrate into compromised tissues, but can also stimulate endogenous regeneration via secreted factors. In this study, several acellularization protocols were applied to spheroids of differentiating ESCs, termed embryoid bodies (EBs), to develop a potential route to deliver ESC-derived molecules, independent of cells, to damaged tissues. The objective of this study was to physically disrupt EBs via lyophilization or freeze-thaw cycling, and in combination with DNase treatment, determine the efficacy of acellularization based upon cell viability, DNA removal, and protein retention. Mechanical disruption and DNase treatment of EBs efficiently inhibited viability and removed DNA while retaining protein content to produce an acellular EB matrix. The EB-derived acellular matrices permitted attachment and repopulation of the constructs by 3T3 fibroblasts in vitro. Overall, these studies demonstrate that effective mechanical means to acellularize EBs may be used in order to further elucidate the composition and function of embryonic extracellular matrices and serve as novel naturally-derived scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available