4.8 Article

Surface energy effects on osteoblast spatial growth and mineralization

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1776-1784

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.026

Keywords

surface energy; osteoblast; hydrophilic; hydrophobic; mineralization

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR054937] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG 13087-11] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While short-term surface energy effects on cell adhesion are relatively well known, little is revealed as regards its later stage effects on cell behavior. We examined surface energy effects on osteoblastic cell growth and mineralization by using human fetal ostcoblastic (hFOB) cells cultured on plasma-treated quartz (contact angle, theta = 0 degrees) and octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-treated quartz (theta = 113 degrees). hFOB cells formed a homogeneous cell layer on plasma-treated quartz, while those cultured on OTS-treated quartz produced randomly distributed clump-like structures that were filled with cells (confirmed by confocal microscopy). Mineral deposition by hFOB cells was spatially homogeneous when cultured on hydrophilic surfaces. Furthermore, cells on hydrophilic surfaces exhibited increased mineralized area as well as enhanced mineral-to-matrix ratio (assessed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy), relative to cells on hydrophobic surfaces. Experiments using other types of osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1, MG63, and SAOS-2) revealed more or less similar effects in spatial growth morphology. It was concluded that hydrophilic surfaces induce homogeneous spatial osteoblastic cell growth and mineral deposition and enhance the quantity (e.g., area) and quality (e.g., mineral-to-matrix ratio) of mineralization relative to hydrophobic surfaces. Our data suggest that surface energy effects on osteoblastic cell differentiation, especially mineralization, may be correlated with surface energy dependent changes in spatial cell growth. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available