4.8 Article

Three-dimensional extracellular matrix-directed cardioprogenitor differentiation: Systematic modulation of a synthetic cell-responsive PEG-hydrogel

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 18, Pages 2757-2766

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.016

Keywords

extracellular matrix; biomimetic hydrogel; poly(ethylene glycol); cardiac tissue engineering; P19 embryonal carcinoma cells; stem cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that synthetic three-dimensional (3D) matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogels can direct differentiation of pluripotent cardio progenitors, using P19 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells as a model, along a cardiac lineage in vitro. In order to systematically probe 3D matrix effects on P19 EC differentiation, matrix elasticity, MMP-sensitivity and the concentration of a matrix-bound RGDSP peptide were modulated. Soft matrices (E = 322 +/- 64.2 Pa, stoichiometric ratio: 0.8), mimicking the elasticity of embryonic cardiac tissue, increased the fraction of cells expressing the early cardiac transcription factor Nkx2.5 around 2-fold compared to embryoid bodies (EB) in suspension. in contrast, stiffer matrices (E = 4036 +/- 419.6 Pa, stoichiometric ratio: 1.2) decreased the number of Nkx2.5-positive cells significantly. Further indicators of cardiac maturation were promoted by ligation of integrins relevant in early cardiac development (alpha(5)beta(1), alpha(v)beta(3)) by the RGDSP ligand in combination with the MMP-sensitivity of the matrix, with a 6-fold increased amount of myosin heavy chain (MHC)-positive cells as compared to EB in suspension. This precisely controlled 3D culture system thus may serve as a potential alternative to natural matrices for engineering cardiac tissue structures for cell culture and potentially therapeutic applications. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available