4.8 Article

Z-scheme water splitting using particulate semiconductors immobilized onto metal layers for efficient electron relay

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages 308-315

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.006

Keywords

Z-scheme water splitting; Photocatalyst; Hydrogen production; SrTiO3:La,Rh/Au/BiVO4; Solid-state device; Particle transfer; Electron transfer

Funding

  1. Global Center of Excellence (GCOE) Program for Chemistry Innovation through Cooperation of Science and Engineering
  2. A3 Foresight Program of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  4. [23000009]
  5. [25810112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major challenge in developing high-performing Z-scheme water splitting systems lies in achieving efficient transfer of electrons between the H-2 and O-2 evolution photocatalysts. Here, we report a Z-scheme system consisting of H-2 evolution photocatalyst (HEP)/metal layer (M)/O-2 evolution photocatalyst (OEP), taking SrTiO3:La,Rh/Au/BiVO4 as a prototype. SrTiO3:La,Rh/Au/BiVO4 systems exhibit photocatalytic activities for overall water splitting that are 6 and 20 times higher than powder suspensions and SrTiO3:La,Rh/BiVO4 systems without metal layers, respectively. The SrTiO3:La,Rh/Au/BiVO4 system achieves an apparent quantum yield of 5.9% under monochromatic light irradiation at 418 nm and a solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 0.2%. The high performance of this system is due to the presence of the Au layer that transfers photogenerated electrons from BiVO4 to SrTiO3:La,Rh in an effective manner. The present study offers a new design concept for HEP/M/OEP solid-state devices to overcome the limitations of earlier Z-scheme systems and thus enable efficient photocatalytic water splitting. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available