4.8 Article

Towards control of smooth muscle cell differentiation in synthetic 3D scaffolds

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 23, Pages 3357-3366

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.033

Keywords

bladder; tissue culture; smooth muscle cell; differentiation; electrospinning; polystyrene; scaffold

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/03130] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [bbs/b/03130, BBS/B/03130] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central tenant of tissue engineering is that cells should be able to recapitulate full functional tissue capability when placed within an appropriate architecture or scaffold. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of three-dimensional (3D) architecture on the differentiated phenotype of human smooth muscle cells derived from the stroma of the lower urinary tract. Stromal cell cultures were established from surgical specimens and the differentiated smooth muscle cell phenotype was monitored by gene expression, immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Expression of contractile proteins, including smooth muscle myosin and smoothelin, was lost by cultures grown on two-dimensional (2D) tissue culture polystyrene, but was regained to some extent by the removal of serum and by the addition of TGF beta(1). Stromal cells were seeded onto plasma-coated electrospun polystyrene scaffolds to examine the influence of 3D architecture on smooth muscle cell phenotype, but differentiation was inhibited by serum proteins that adsorbed non-specifically onto the large surface area of the scaffold. Stromal cells failed to adhere to the scaffold in serum-free conditions, but laminin pre-coating of the scaffold prevented serum adsorption and promoted cell attachment and differentiation. The study highlights how non-specific factors, such as serum adsorption, may confound the development of materials for tissue engineering. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available