4.7 Article

The Hubble Space Telescope survey of BL lacertae objects.: I.: Surface brightness profiles, magnitudes, and radii of host galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 532, Issue 2, Pages 740-815

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/308618

Keywords

BL Lacertae objects : general; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD galaxies : structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on a large Hubble Space Telescope imaging survey of BL Lac objects, at spatial resolution greater than or similar to 10 times better than previous ground-based surveys. We focus on data reduction and analysis, describing the procedures used to model the host galaxy surface brightness radial profiles. A total of 69 host galaxies were resolved out of 110 objects observed, including almost all sources at z less than or similar to 0.5. We classify them morphologically by fitting with either an exponential disk or a de Vaucouleurs profile; when one fit is preferred over the other, in 58 of 69 cases, it is invariably the elliptical morphology. This is a very strong result given the large number of BL Lac objects, the unprecedented spatial resolution, and the homogeneity of the data set. With the present reclassification of the host galaxy of 1418+546 as an elliptical, there remain no undisputed examples of a disk galaxy hosting a BL Lac nucleus. This implies that, at 99% confidence, fewer than 7% of BL Lac objects can be in disk galaxies. The apparent magnitude of the host galaxies varies with distance as expected if the absolute magnitudes are approximately the same, with a spread of +/-1 mag, out to redshift z similar to 0.5. At larger redshifts, only six of 23 BL Lac objects are resolved so the present data do not constrain possible luminosity evolution of the host galaxies. The collective Hubble diagram for BL Lac host galaxies and radio galaxies strongly supports their unification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available