4.7 Article

Carbon and nutrients of Scots pine stands on sandy soils in Lithuania in relation to bioenergy sustainability

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 250-259

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.034

Keywords

Scots pine; Pinus sylvestris; Aboveground biomass; Forest bioenergy; Carbon; Nutrients

Funding

  1. European Community [WOOD-EN-MAN, QLK5-CT-2001-00527]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable forestry is based on the principle that harvesting practices should avoid negative influence on soil fertility, wood production and long-term soil carbon (C) stocks. We examined C and nutrient concentrations and stocks of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands on Arenosols in south-western Lithuania. The stands were 10, 20, 40, 50 and 65 years of age. C concentrations were relatively constant, while the concentrations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S often varied between compartments and stand ages. The total aboveground stocks of nitrogen (N) were estimated to be in the range of 185-260 kg ha(-1), and 78-189 kg ha(-1) for calcium (Ca), 75-104 kg ha(-1) for potassium (K), 22-33 kg ha(-1) for phosphorus (P), 21-41 kg ha(-1) for magnesium (Mg) and 16-28 kg ha(-1) for sulphur (S). Corresponding stocks of the crown alone were 139-207 kg ha(-1) of N, 54-88 kg ha(-1) of Ca, 44-79 kg ha(-1) of K, 15-26 kg ha(-1) of P, 15-23 kg ha(-1) of Mg, and 11-15 kg ha(-1) of S. Biomass, C and nutrient stocks in the crown did not change with age, whereas the stemwood stocks increased with stand age. The total removals of C and N over a whole 100-year rotation were simulated to be 129 Mg ha(-1) and 449 kg ha(-1), respectively. An example scenario was created to compare the magnitude of potential nutrient removals with the atmospheric influx, soil stocks, and the internal litterfall flux. We suggest that intensified utilisation of these stands for bioenergy may be sustainable. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available