4.6 Article

Identifying causes of ground-penetrating radar reflections using time-domain reflectometry and sedimentological analyses

Journal

SEDIMENTOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 435-449

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2000.00304.x

Keywords

dielectric impedance; ground-penetrating radar; magnetic permeability; relative permittivity; time-domain reflectometry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a geophysical technique widely used to study the shallow subsurface and identify various sediment features that reflect electromagnetic waves. However, little is known about the exact cause of GPR reflections because few studies have coupled wave theory to petrophysical data. In this study, a 100- and 200-MHz GPR survey was conducted on aeolian deposits in a quarry. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to obtain detailed information on the product of relative permittivity (epsilon(r)) and relative magnetic permeability (mu(r)), which mainly controls the GPR contrast parameter in the subsurface. Combining TDR data and lacquer peels from the quarry wall allowed the identification of various relationships between sediment characteristics and epsilon(r)mu(r). Synthetic radar traces, constructed using the TDR logs and sedimentological data from the lacquer peels, were compared with the actual GPR sections. Numerous peaks in epsilon(r)mu(r), which are superimposed on a baseline value of 4 for dry sand, are caused by potential GPR reflectors. These increases in epsilon(r)mu(r) coincide with the presence of either organic material, having a higher water content and relative permittivity than the surrounding sediment, or iron oxide bands, enhancing relative magnetic permeability and causing water to stagnate on top of them. Sedimentary structures, as reflected in textural change, only result in possible GPR reflections when the volumetric water content exceeds 0.055. The synthetic radar traces provide an improved insight into the behaviour of radar waves and show that GPR results may be ambiguous because of multiples and interference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available