4.6 Article

Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 461-468

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1999.1084

Keywords

Helianthus annuus L.; Zea mays L.; Glycine max (L.) Merrill; grain yield; harvest index; plant density; reproductive allocation; meristem allocation; plasticity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the relationship between grain yield per plant (Y-p) and shoot biomass per plant (S-p) in three annual crops with contrasting reproductive strategies: sunflower, a determinate species with a single inflorescence; maize, a determinate species with a limited capacity to adjust the number of ears in response to resource availability; and indeterminate soybean, a species with a large capacity to adjust the number of inflorescences. Our working hypotheses were: H-1-the relationship between Y-p and S-p is linear; H-2-the intercept of the model is zero, i.e. there is not a threshold plant mass for reproduction. A wide range of Y-p and S-p was generated by manipulation of plant density; S-p varied between 0.3 and 196 g per plant in soybean, between 6 and 873 g per plant in sunflower and between 23 and 697 g per plant in maize. Within these broad ranges of plant size, both hypotheses were rejected in five out of six experiments, i.e. the relationship between Y-p and S-p departed from linearity and there was a threshold for S-p below which no grain set occurred. The S-p threshold for grain set varied widely among species; it was close to 2 g per plant for soybean, 27 g per plant for sunflower and 43-71 g per plant for maize. Because of this size threshold and non-linearity, harvest index (HI = YpSp-1) was stable for mid-size plants, diminished slightly for large plants, and diminished sharply for smaller plants in all three crops. Harvest index stability was highest in soybean, intermediate in sunflower and lowest in maize. Differential stability of reproductive partitioning partially derived from contrasting patterns of melistem allocation. (C) 2000 Annals of Botany Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available