4.7 Article

Torrefaction of oil palm mesocarp fiber and their effect on pelletizing

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 159-165

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.041

Keywords

Torrefaction; Response surface methodology; Severity factor (SF); Calorific value; Energy yield; Torrefied pellet

Funding

  1. New & Renewable Energy Technology Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20103020090040]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0020141]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20103020090040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal condition for the torrefacdon of oil palm mesocarp fiber was investigated by response surface methodology. Pelletizing properties of torrefied biomass were analyzed depending on torrefaction conditions. The elemental composition of torrefied biomass was influenced by the Severity Factor (SF) of torrefaction. The carbon content in the torrefied biomass increased from 48.02 to 54.83%, while the hydrogen and oxygen contents decreased with the SF. The calorific value of torrefied biomass ranged from 19.15 to 22.82 MJ kg(-1). This implied that the energy contained in the torrefied biomass increased by 5-19%, when compared with untreated biomass. The calorific value and weight loss in the biomass increased as the SF increased. The energy yield was high at a low SF, allowing for weight loss and calorific value. At a high SF, no pellets were made by torrefied biomass, or many defects were shown in the torrefied pellet, while the pellets were produced with good formation at a low SF. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available