4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hot-water extraction and its effect on soda pulping of aspen woodchips

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages 5-13

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.054

Keywords

Hemicellulose; Hot-water extraction; Soda pulping; Kappa number; Viscosity; Yield

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot-water extraction of industrial aspen woodchips (mainly Populus tremuloides) and subsequent soda pulping were carried out in an M/K(R) digester. It was found that mass removal of woodchips was 4.74% at 160 degrees C for 15 min with a water-to-wood ratio of 4:1, and that mass removal increased with extraction time and temperature. The mass removal reached 21.38% at 160 degrees C for 210 min. Less than 6% lignin (on total wood mass) from virgin woodchips was dissolved in the extraction liquor. The concentrations of xylose, acetic acid, formic acid and furfural in the extraction liquor were measured by H-1 NMR, which were found to increase with extraction time and temperature. Furfural increased sharply beyond 150 min of extraction at 160 degrees C. The residual woodchips were subjected to soda pulping at 150 degrees C for 3 h with 20% effective alkali and a liquor-to-wood ratio of 4.5:1. Compared with the control sample, the overall pulp yield for extracted woodchips decreased little while rejects decreased sharply. Kappa number of the pulps decreased with increasing extraction time and temperature. Viscosity of the pulp increased with increasing extraction temperature and duration for the first 90 min. Beyond 90 min of extraction, the resulting pulp viscosity decreased with increasing duration of extraction. The water-to-wood ratio had little effect on the entire process. Considering bioconversion of extracted hemicellulose to fuel/chemicals and the resultant pulping characteristics, hot-water extraction at 165 degrees C for 90 min with a water-to-water ratio of 5:1 for aspen woodchips seems to be optimum. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available