3.8 Article

Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 812-819

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200004000-00014

Keywords

strategies; mechanical demand; muscular work

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate changes in lower extremity joint energy absorption for different landing heights and landing techniques. Methods: Nine healthy, active male subjects volunteered to perform step-off landings from three different heights (0.32 m, 2.5 m(-s); 0.62 m, 3.5 m(-s); and 1.03 m, 4.5 m(-s)) using three different landing techniques(soft, SFL; normal, NML; and stiff lauding, STL). Each subject initially performed five NML trials at 0.62 m to serve as a baseline condition and subsequently executed five trials in each of the nine test conditions (3 heights X 3 techniques). Results: The results demonstrated general increases in peak ground reaction forces, peak joint moments, and powers with increases in landing height and stiffness. The mean eccentric work was 0.52, 0.74, and 0.87 J.kg(-1) by the ankle muscles, and 0.94, 1.31, and 2.15 J.kg(-1) by the hip extensors, at 0.32, 0.62, and 1.03 m, respectively. The average eccentric work performed by the knee extensors was 1.21, 1.63, and 2.26 J.kg(-1) for the same three heights. Conclusions: The knee joint extensors were consistent contributors to energy dissipation. The ankle plantarflexors contributed more in the STL landings, whereas the hip extensors were greater contributors during the sn landings. Also a shift from ankle to hip strategy was observed as landing height increased.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available