4.7 Article

Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1600-1606

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.059

Keywords

Paper sludge; Cellulase; Response surface methodology; Hydrolysis; Fermentation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20676045, 20977033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conversion of ethanol from paper sludge using the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process with cellulase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae GIM-2 were investigated in this paper. Optimization strategy based on statistical experimental designs was employed to enhance degree of saccharification by enzymatic hydrolysis of paper sludge. Based on the Plackett-Burman design, hydrolysis time, substrate concentration and cellulase dosage were selected as the most significant variable on the degree of saccharification. Subsequently, the optimum combination of the selected factors was investigated by a Box-Behnken approach. A mathematical model was developed to show the effects a each factor and their combinatorial interactions on the degree of saccharification. The optimal conditions were hydrolysis time 82.7 h, substrate concentration 40.8 g L-1 and cellulase dosage 18.1 FPU g(-1) substrate, and a degree of saccharification of 82.1% can be achieved. When hydrolysate was further fermented with S. cerevisiae GIM-2, the conversion rate of sugar to ethanol was 34.2% and the ethanol yield was 190 g kg(-1) of dry paper sludge, corresponding to an overall conversion yield of 56.3% of the available carbohydrates on the initial substrate. The results derived from this study indicate that the response surface methodology is a useful tool for optimizing the hydrolysis conditions to converse paper sludge to ethanol. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available