4.7 Article

Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 1587-1604

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.08.004

Keywords

Biofuels; Gasification; Methane synthesis; CO2-removal; Thermo-economic modelling; Process design; Process integration

Funding

  1. Competence Centre for Energy and Mobility (CCEM)
  2. Erdgas Ostschweiz AG
  3. Gasverbund Mittelland AG
  4. Gaznat SA (all Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed thermo-economic model considering different technological alternatives for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass is presented. First, candidate technology for processes based on biomass gasification and subsequent methanation is discussed and assembled in a general superstructure. Both energetic and economic models for biomass drying with air or steam, thermal pretreatment by torrefaction or pyrolysis, indirectly and directly heated gasification, methane synthesis and carbon dioxide removal physical absorption pressure swing adsorption and polymeric membranes are then developed. Performance computations for the different process steps and some exemplary technology scenarios of integrated plants are carried out, and overall energy and exergy efficiencies in the range of 69-76% and 63-69%, respectively, are assessed. For these scenarios, the production cost of SNG including the investment depreciation is estimated to 76-107 (sic) MWh(SNG)(-1) for a plant capacity of 20 MWth,biomass, whereas 59-97 (sic) MWh(SNG)(-1) might be reached at scales of 150 MWth,biomass and above. Based on this work, a future thermo-economic optimisation will allow for deter-mining the most promising options for the polygeneration of fuel, power and heat. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available