4.4 Article

Pharmacologic Inhibition of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Preserves Cardiac Function After Ischemic and Nonischemic Injury in the Mouse

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000247

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Heart Association
  2. NIH [AG041161]
  3. Virginia Innovation Partnership

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sterile inflammation resulting from myocardial injury activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and amplifies the inflammatory response mediating further damage. Methods: We used 2 experimental models of ischemic injury (acute myocardial infarction [AMI] with and without reperfusion) and a model of nonischemic injury due to doxorubicin 10 mg/kg to determine whether the NLRP3 inflammasome preserved cardiac function after injury. Results: Treatment with the NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor in the reperfused AMI model caused a significant reduction in infarct size measured at pathology or as serum cardiac troponin I level (-56% and -82%, respectively, both P < 0.001) and preserved left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS, 31 +/- 2 vs. vehicle 26% +/- 1%, P = 0.003). In the non-reperfused AMI model, treatment with the NLRP3 inhibitor significantly limited LV systolic dysfunction at 7 days (LVFS of 20 +/- 2 vs. 14% +/- 1%, P = 0.002), without a significant effect on infarct size. In the doxorubicin model, a significant increase in myocardial interstitial fibrosis and a decline in systolic function were seen in vehicle-treated mice, whereas treatment with the NLRP3 inhibitor significantly reduced fibrosis (-80%, P = 0.001) and preserved systolic function (LVFS 35 +/- 2 vs. vehicle 27% +/- 2%, P = 0.017). Conclusions: Pharmacological inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome limits cell death and LV systolic dysfunction after ischemic and nonischemic injury in the mouse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available