4.7 Article

Failure of the component additivity rule to predict gas yields of biomass in flash pyrolysis at 950 °C

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 316-326

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.07.003

Keywords

Flash pyrolysis; Cellulose; Hemicellulose; Lignin; Biomass

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ligno-cellulosic biomass from different sources presents variable composition. The main aim of this work was to develop a method to predict the gas yields after flash pyrolysis (and tar cracking) at 950 degrees C in an Entrained Flow Reactor of any biomass from its composition in the three main components - cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. For this approach to be successful, three conditions need to be met: (C(1)) Pyrolytic behaviour of celluloses from different biomasses is similar, as is hemicellulose and lignin behaviour. (C(2)) There is no interaction between the components. (C(3)) Extractives and ashes have no impact on the pyrolysis process. Two approaches were chosen to investigate the condition C(1): (i) Celluloses, hemicelluloses and lignins of various sources were pyrolysed. Results show that hemicelluloses and lignins from different sources do not form the same quantities of gases. (ii) An attempt was made to identify the gas yields of theoretical components that are able to predict flash pyrolytic behaviour of any biomass. Results tend to show that this is not possible. The condition C(2) is investigated by comparing the gas yields of the components taken separately and the gas yields of mixes of the components. Two types of mixing were carried out: simple mixing and intimate mixing. Results show that interactions occur between the components during flash pyrolysis. The condition C(3) was not investigated here; it can nevertheless be concluded that the behaviour of a biomass during flash pyrolysis at high temperature cannot be predicted from its composition in cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available