4.7 Article

Assessment of process control parameters in the biochemical methane potential of sunflower oil cake

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 1235-1244

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.019

Keywords

Biochemical methane potential (BMP); Sunflower oil cake (SuOC); Inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR); Anaerobic digestion

Funding

  1. European Union [SES-CT-2004-502824-6th]
  2. Ministry of Educacion y Ciencia of the Spanish Government [CTM 2005-01260/TECNO]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A laboratory-scale study was conducted on the batch anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake (SuOC), solid waste derived from the extraction process of sunflower oil. A multi-reactor system was used to compare methane production from this waste at inoculum to substrate ratios (ISRs) of 3.0, 2.0, 1.5. 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5 (expressed as volatile solids (VS) basis). The tests were carried out at mesophilic temperature (35 degrees C) and run against a control of inoculum without substrate. The results obtained in the biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests showed that the ultimate methane yield (Y(M,ult)) decreased considerably from 227 +/- 23 to 107 +/- 11 ml CH(4) at standard temperature and pressure (STP) conditions g(-1) VS(added) when the ISR decreased from 3.0 to 0.5, showing a clear influence of the ISR on the methane yield coefficient. The biodegradability (BD) of the waste also decreased from 86% to 41% when the ISR varied from 3.0 to 0.5. A net total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) yield of 39.2 mg N g(-1) VS(added) was obtained, and this value was not influenced by the ISRs assayed, which demonstrated the appropriate operation of the hydrolytic-acidogenic stage of the overall digestion process. A clear imbalance of the methanogenic process was observed at the lowest ISRs studied (0.5 and 0.8) due to a considerable increase in CODs and TVFA in the digestates. The profile of VIA was also influenced by the ISR, typical of the proteinaceous substrates. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available