4.0 Article

Sedation with non-sedating'' antihistamines: four prescription-event monitoring studies in general practice

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 320, Issue 7243, Pages 1184-1186

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1184

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To investigate the frequency with which sedation was reported in post-marketing surveillance studies of four second generation antihistamines: loratadine, cetirizine, fexofenadine, and acrivastine. Design Prescription-event monitoring studies. Setting Prescriptions were obtained for each cohort in the immediate post-marketing period. Subjects Event data were obtained for a total of 43 363 patients. Main outcome measure Reporting of sedation or drowsiness. Results The adds ratios (adjusted for age and sex) for the incidence of sedation were 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.11; P = 0.1) for fexofenadine; 2.79 (1.69 to 4.58; p < 0.0001) for acrivastine, and 3.53 (2.07 to 5.42; P < 0.0001) for cetirizine compared with loratadine. No increased risk of accident or injury it as evident with any of the four drugs. Conclusions Although the risk of sedation was low with all four drugs, fexofenadine and loratadine may be more appropriate for people working in safety critical jobs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available