4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Even low-dose aspirin inhibits arachidonic acid-induced vasodilation in heart failure

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 530-537

Publisher

MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2000.106290

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is some evidence that aspirin may be harmful to patients with congestive heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, but there has never been any direct examination of the vascular effects of aspirin in these patients. We sought to determine whether there is an arachidonic acid-dependent vasodilator pathway in resistance arteries in humans, whether it is affected by congestive heart failure, and whether it is inhibited by low-dose aspirin. Methods: A locally active dose of arachidonic acid was infused into the nondominant brachial artery while forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 healthy subjects in a control group and 15 patients with congestive heart failure treated with ACE inhibitor. Patients with congestive heart failure R-ere studied after administration of 0 mg, 75 mg, and 300 mg aspirin for 14 days. Results: Arachidonic acid produced progressive and incremental vasodilation (up to 64%). There was no significant difference between patients and healthy control subjects studied after administration of 0 mg aspirin. In patients, hoc-ever, administration of 75 mg and 300 mg aspirin inhibited mean vasodilation by 55% and 59%, respectively Conclusions: There is an arachidonic acid-dependent vasodilator pathway in humans, This pathway is not significantly affected by congestive hart failure. It is significantly inhibited by even low-dose aspirin therapy These results imply that even the very lon-est dose of aspirin in common use for cardioprotection has potentially detrimental vasoconstrictor effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available