4.6 Article

Relationship between body fat distribution and bone mineral density in premenopausal Japanese women

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 722-725

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00663-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the relationship between body fat distribution and bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: Subjects were 282 premenopausal women (mean age a standard deviation [SD], 38.8 +/- 8.5 years; range, 20-51 years) with regular menstrual cycles. Baseline characteristics included age, age at menarche, height, weight, body mass index ([BMI], weight/height(2)), and parity. Anthropometric characteristics including the ratio of trunk fat mass to leg fat mass (trunk-leg fat ratio), percentage of body fat, and total body lean mass were measured by whole-body scanning with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Lumbar spine BMD (L2-4) was also measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Correlations of BMD to baseline and anthropometric characteristics were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Although height, trunk-leg fat ratio, and total body lean mass were positively correlated with lumbar spine BMD (r =.18, P < .01; r = .17, P < .01; and r = .25, P < .001; respectively), age at menarche was inversely correlated with BMD (r = -.19, P < .01). On multivariable analysis, trunk-leg fat ratio, height, age at menarche, and total body lean mass were still independently correlated with lumbar spine BMD (P < .05). However, total fat mass was not correlated with BMD. Conclusion: Upper body fat distribution rather than overall adiposity is associated with lumbar spine BMD in premenopausal women. Humoral factors associated with body fat mass appear to influence lumbar spine BR;ID. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available