4.7 Article

Protein Crystallization and Biosensor Applications of Hydrogel-Based Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 3959-3965

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm301189f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G014299/1, EP/G014736/1, EP/G027005]
  2. EPSRC [EP/G014736/1, EP/G027005/1, EP/G014299/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G027005/1, EP/G014299/1, EP/G014736/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [1232404] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have characterized the imprinting capability of a family of acrylamide polymer-based molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for bovine hemoglobin (BHb) and trypsin (Tryp) using spectrophotometric and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor techniques. Bulk gel characterization on acrylamide (AA), N-hydroxymethylacrylamide (NHMA), and N-isopropylacrylamide (NiPAM) gave varied selectivities when compared with nonimprinted polymers. We have also harnessed the ability of the MIPs to facilitate protein crystallization as a means of evaluating their selectivity for cognate and noncognate proteins. Crystallization trials indicated improved crystal formation in the order NiPAM < AA < NHMA. QCM studies of thin film MIPs confirm this trend with N-hydroxymethyl acrylamide MIPs exhibiting best discrimination between MIP and NIP and also cognate/noncognate protein loading. Equivalent results for acrylamide MIPs suggested that the cavities were equally selective for both proteins, while N-isopropylacrylamide MIPs were not selective for either cognate BHb or noncognate BSA. All BHb MIP-QCM sensors based on AA, NHMA, or NiPAM were essentially nonresponsive to smaller, proteins. Protein crystallization studies validated the hydrophilic efficacy of MIPS indicated in the QCM studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available