4.5 Article

Flammability limit measurements for dusts in 20-L and 1-m3 vessels

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
Volume 13, Issue 3-5, Pages 209-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-4230(99)00043-1

Keywords

dust explosions; minimum explosion concentration; limiting oxygen concentration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of flammability limits have been measured for various dusts in the Fike 1-m(3) (1000-L) chamber and in the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) 20-L chamber. The first limit is the minimum explosible concentration (MEC), which was measured at several ignition energies. In addition to the three dusts studied previously (bituminous coal, anthracite coal, and gilsonite), this work continues the effort by adding three additional dusts: RoRo93, lycopodium, and iron powder. These materials were chosen to extend the testing to non-coal materials as well as to a metallic dust. The new MEC data corroborate the previous observations that very strong ignitors can overdrive the ignition in the smaller 20-L chamber. Recommendations are given in regard to appropriate ignition energies to be used in the two chambers. The study also considered the other limiting component, oxygen. Limiting oxygen concentration (LOC) testing was performed in the same 20-L and 1-m(3) vessels for gilsonite, bituminous coal, RoRo93, and aluminum dusts. The objective was to establish the protocol for testing at different volumes. A limited investigation was made into overdriving in the 20-L vessel. The LOC results tended to show slightly lower results for the smaller test volume. The results indicated that overdriving could occur and that ignition energies of 2.5 kJ in the 20-L vessel would yield comparable results to those in the 1-m(3) vessel using 10.0 kJ. The studies also illustrate the importance of dust concentration on LOC determinations. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available