4.5 Article

Alterations in skeletal muscle morphology in glucose-toelrant elderly hypertensive men: relationship to development of hypertension and heart rate

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 559-565

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200018050-00008

Keywords

capillary supply; heart rate; hypertension; muscle fibre distribution; obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To compare the muscle morphology in hypertensive subjects with that in controls and to test the hypothesis of a relation between heart rate, development of hypertension and muscle morphology that is independent of glucose intolerance. Patients and methods We studied 43 glucose-tolerant, untreated hypertensive subjects and 113 healthy controls in a longitudinal cohort of 70-year-old men. Metabolic status (oral glucose tolerance test and euglycemic, hyperinsulinaemic clamp test), muscle fibre distribution (myosin ATPase staining) and capillary supply (amylase-PAS method) were evaluated, Blood pressure and heart rate data were available from both ages 50 and 70 years. Results Hypertensive subjects had a significantly smaller mean number of capillaries per fibre than controls (1.53 versus 1.64; P=0.04). In hypertensive subjects, the proportions of type I and type II fibres were correlated to mean arterial pressure (r= -0.56 and r= 0.52, respectively, P< 0.05 for both), The increase in mean arterial pressure over 20 years was closely correlated to capillary density in mm(2) (r= -0.62; P< 0.0001). Capillary supply was inversely related to resting heart rate both at ages 50 and 70 years. Conclusions Skeletal muscle of glucose tolerant hypertensive subjects showed a lower capillary supply than that of controls, This capillary rarefaction was correlated to increase in mean arterial pressure over two decades and to supine heart rate. This is compatible with the suggestion that higher sympathetic drive might generate structural alterations in muscle capillarization, I Hypertens 2000, 18:559-565 (C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available