Journal
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 651-694Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1162/003355300554764
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper considers the interpretation of evidence from social experiments when persons randomized out of a program being evaluated have good substitutes for it, and when persons randomized into a program drop out to pursue better alternatives. Using data from an experimental evaluation of a classroom training program, we document the empirical importance of control group substitution and treatment group dropping out. Evidence that one program is ineffective relative to close substitutes is not evidence that the type of service provided by all of the programs is ineffective, although that is the way experimental evidence is often interpreted.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available