4.7 Article

Characteristics of chemically reacting compressible homogeneous turbulence

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1189-1209

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.870370

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are conducted to study the turbulence-chemical reaction interactions in homogeneous decaying compressible fluid flows. The reaction is of a single-step irreversible Arrhenius type. The results indicate that the heat of reaction has a noticeable influence on the solenoidal and the dilatational turbulent motions. The effect of reaction on the solenoidal velocity field is primarily due to variation of the molecular diffusivity coefficients with temperature and appears at small scales. However, the dilatational motions are affected more than the solenoidal motions and are intensified at all length scales. The decay rate of the turbulent kinetic energy is dependent on the molecular dissipation and the pressure-dilation correlation. In isothermal reacting cases, the net contribution of the pressure-dilatation is small and the turbulent energy decays continuously due to viscous dissipation. In the exothermic reacting cases, the pressure-dilatation tends to increase the turbulent kinetic energy when the reaction is significant. Analysis of the flow structure indicates that the flow is dominated by strain in the reaction zones. Also, consistent with previous studies, the scalar gradient tends to align with the most compressive strain eigenvector and the vorticity vector tends to align with the intermediate strain eigenvector. The heat of reaction weakens this preferential alignment, primarily due to variation in molecular transport coefficients. The spatial and the compositional structure of the flame are also affected by the modification of the turbulence and the molecular coefficients. (C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S1070-6631(00)00205-1].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available