4.6 Article

Physical activity and other risk factors in male twin-pairs discordant for coronary heart disease

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 193-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00368-8

Keywords

coronary disease; diabetes mellitus; hypertension; exercise; genes; smoking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Twin-pairs discordant for coronary heart disease (CHD) can be used to examine the possible contribution of genetic and other familial factors to the relationship between Ct-ID risk factors, in particular physical inactivity at leisure, and CHD. Methods and results: In 1975 at baseline, 8205 men aged 25-69 years of the Finnish Twin Cohort without overt Ct-ID responded to a questionnaire. The outcome measures were hospitalization for CHD or death from CHD before age 70 between 1977 to 1995 based on reliable nationwide registries. Among all men, the age-adjusted relative risk of CHD was 0.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39, 0.71) in men participating in conditioning exercise compared to sedentary men, based on their questionnaire responses. The age, and covariate (body-mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes) adjusted-relative risk was 0.68 (CI 0.50, 0.92). Among the twin-pairs discordant for CHD during follow-up (N = 311), the odds ratio (OR) of having CHD was 0.54 (CI 0.27, 1.09) for conditioning exercisers compared to sedentary men. The point estimates from discordant pairs analyses were of the same magnitude as obtained from the analyses of individuals, though statistically not significant due to smaller samples. In contrast, smoking (OR 3.21) and diabetes (OR 10.0) at baseline were also significant predictors of CHD. Conclusions: By studying twins we were able to examine genetic and other familial selection bias and found further supporting evidence that leisure conditioning physical exercise compared to sedentariness helps prevent CHD in men, but smoking was a stronger risk factor. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available