4.1 Article

Spray diagnostics for the twenty-first century

Journal

ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS
Volume 10, Issue 3-5, Pages 439-474

Publisher

BEGELL HOUSE INC
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v10.i3-5.110

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical review of the progress in atomization and spray technology is presented. Although significant progress has been made with the benefit of developments in theory, diagnostics, and modeling, the ability to accurately prescribe or predict the spray mid related two-phase turbulent-flow behavior in detail has generally eluded our efforts. Available diagnostics are reviewed and some extrapolations are offered suggesting where evolving technologies in the areas of electronics, computers, software, and information technology (IT) might lend. Experimentation conducted over the past decades is criticized for lacking completeness and quality ill the information measured and for its failure to identify, measure, and record all of the significant parameters. Deficiencies in measurement capabilities are recognized and arguments are presented regarding the need to integrate the experimentation and modeling. Proposed strategies include the simultaneous experimentation with interactive model predictions, which way be the only means available to completely describe the spray processes and attain the development needed irt actually predicting the phenomena. Currently, the typical time scale fur interactions between experiments and numerical modeling are of the order of gears. Elapsed time needs to be reduced to seconds and, in many cases, to real time. Reaching the goal of accurate prediction, understanding and the ability to prescribe spray characteristics will require highly automated data acquisition, integrated modeling, storage, and efficient, Easy access to large volumes of information. This will require even greater reliance on computing power, information systems, and the Next Generation Internet (NGI).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available