4.3 Article

Cardiac troponin I and creatine kinase-MB release after different cardiac surgeries

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 456-464

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000044

Keywords

cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; creatine kinase-MB; troponin I

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo conduct a comparative study of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and MB isoenzyme of serum creatine kinase (CK-MB) after different cardiac surgeries.MethodsConsecutive cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass (200 adults, 144 men, 6811 years): 67 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), 27 aortic valve surgery, 21 mitral valve surgery, 11 thoracic aorta surgery, and 74 combined surgery. Postoperative cTnI and CK-MB were measured on admission to the ICU and at fixed time until the fifth postoperative day.ResultsPeak values of cTnI (median 5.8ng/ml; interquartile range 3.6-11.9) and CK-MB (29.0ng/ml; 15.6-60.4) were reached mainly within 18h after the end of surgery (85% of cTnI and 95% of CK-MB highest determinations) without differences among groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time significantly correlated with markers' peak values. At multivariate analysis, mitral valve surgery showed greater cTnI, CK-MB, and their cumulative area under the curve than other isolated procedures. Thoracic aorta surgery showed lower cumulative area under the curve for both markers than CABG and combined surgery. Mitral valve surgery had significant later reduction of both markers in comparison with other procedures. No patient in mitral valve surgery group reached cTnI values in the normal laboratory range within 5 postoperative days.ConclusionRelease pattern of cTnI and CK-MB after heart surgery depends on the type of procedure. Mitral valve surgery was characterized by highest and longest elevation of postoperative markers' concentration. Determinants of differences in myocardial injury biomarkers and their prognostic value after valve surgery should be accurately assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available