4.5 Article

Simulation of the plasma-wall interaction in a tokamak with the Monte Carlo code ERO-TEXTOR

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 989-1001

Publisher

INT ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/40/5/311

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction of plasma with the walls has been one of the critical issues in the development of fusion energy research. On the one hand, plasma induced erosion can seriously limit the lifetime of the wall components, while, on the other hand, eroded particles can be transported into the core plasma where they lead to dilution of the fusion plasma and to energy losses due to radiation. Low-Z wall materials induce only small radiation losses in the plasma core but suffer from large physical sputtering rates. Carbon based materials in addition suffer from chemically induced erosion. High-Z wall materials show significantly smaller erosion but lead to large radiation losses. One of the main goals of present plasma-wall studies is to find a special choice of wall materials for steady state plasma scenarios that will provide an optimum with respect to fuel dilution, radiation losses, wall lifetime and fuel inventory in the walls. To obtain a better understanding of the processes and to estimate the plasma-wall interaction behaviour in future fusion devices the 3-D Monte Carlo code ERO-TEXTOR, based originally on the ERO code, has been developed. It models the plasma-wall interaction and transport processes in the vicinity of a surface positioned in the boundary layer of TEXTOR. The main aim is to simulate the erosion and redeposition behaviour of different wall materials under various plasma conditions and to compare this with experimental results. This contribution describes the main features of the ERO-TEXTOR code and gives some examples of simulation calculations to illustrate the application of the code.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available