4.7 Article

Artificially increased ascorbate content affects zeaxanthin formation but not thermal energy dissipation or degradation of antioxidants during cold-induced photooxidative stress in maize leaves

Journal

PLANTA
Volume 210, Issue 6, Pages 964-969

Publisher

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004250050704

Keywords

antioxidant; chlorophyll a fluorescence; L-galactono-1,4-lactone; photooxidative stress; xanthophyll cycle; Zea (light stress)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infiltrating detached maize (Zea mays L.) leaves with L-galactono-1,4-lactone (L-GAL) resulted in a 4-fold increase in the content of leaf ascorbate. Upon exposure to high irradiance (1000 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1)) at 5 degrees C, L-GAL leaves de-epoxidized the xanthophyll-cycle pigments faster than the control leaves: the maximal ratio of de-epoxidized xanthophyll-cycle pigments to the whole xanthophyll-cycle pool was the same in both leaf types. The elevated ascorbate content, together with the faster violaxanthin de-epoxidation. did not affect the degree of photoinhibition and the kinetics of the recovery from photoinhibition, assayed by monitoring the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem ZI primary photochemistry (F-v/F-m). Under the experimental conditions, the thermal energy dissipation seems to be zeaxanthin-independent since, in contrast to the de-epoxidation, the decrease in the efficiency of excitation-energy capture by open photosystem II reaction centers (F-v'/F-m') during the high-irradiance treatment at low temperature showed the same kinetic in both leaf types. This was also observed for the recovery of the maximal fluorescence after stress. Furthermore, the elevated ascorbate content did not diminish the degradation of pigments or alpha-tocopherol when leaves were exposed for up to 24 h to high irradiance at low temperature. Moreover, a higher content of ascorbate appeared to increase the requirement for reduced glutathione.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available