4.7 Article

Local mechanisms drive genioglossus activation in obstructive sleep apnea

Journal

Publisher

AMER LUNG ASSOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9907109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR02635] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 60292, HL 48531] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) require increased pharyngeal muscle dilator activation during wakefulness to maintain upper airway patency. Negative pressure is one potential stimulus for this neuromuscular compensation. Individuals with OSA who have previously undergone tracheostomy provide an opportunity to study upper airway physiology in both the presence and absence of upper airway respiratory stimuli. If negative pressure (or another local airway stimulus) were important in driving pharyngeal dilator muscle activation, one would predict that during nasal breathing, the pharynx of a tracheostomized patient would be exposed to negative pressure, and that high levels of muscle activation would therefore be measured. Conversely, during breathing by the patient through the tracheal stoma, one would expect tow levels of muscle activation in the absence of local stimuli. We measured a number of respiratory variables, including genioglossus activation under both nasal and tracheal stomal breathing conditions, in five patients. In all five patients there was a significant and substantial decrease in both peak phasic (100 +/- 0 to 53.4 +/- 9.2 arbitrary units [mean +/- SEM], p < 0.01) and tonic genioglossus activation (36.3 +/- 5.3 to 20.7 +/- 3.9 arbitrary units, p < 0.05) during stomal breathing as compared with nasal breathing. We conclude that local upper airway respiratory stimuli, possibly negative pressure, are important in mediating the increased pharyngeal dilator muscle activation seen in sleep apnea patients during wakefulness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available