4.7 Review

How does ascorbic acid prevent endothelial dysfunction?

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1421-1429

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00269-0

Keywords

ascorbic acid; atherosclerosis; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase; endothelial dysfunction; S-nitrosothiols; superoxide; free radicals

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50435] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human coronary and peripheral arteries show endothelial dysfunction in a variety of conditions, including atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and hypertension. This dysfunction manifests as a loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine infusion or sheer stress, and is typically associated with decreased generation of nitric oxide (NO) by the endothelium. Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, when acutely infused or chronically ingested, improves the defective endothelium-dependent vasodilation present in these clinical conditions. The mechanism of the ascorbic acid effect is unknown, although it has been attributed to an antioxidant function of the vitamin to enhance the synthesis or prevent the breakdown of NO. In this review, multiple mechanisms are considered that might account for the ability of ascorbate to preserve NO. These include ascorbate-induced decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, scavenging of intracellular superoxide, release of NO from circulating or tissue S-nitrosothiols, direct reduction of nitrite to NO, and activation of either endothelial NO synthase or smooth muscle guanylate cyclase. The ability of ascorbic acid supplements to enhance defective endothelial function in human diseases provides a rationale for use of such supplements in these conditions. However, it is first necessary to determine which of the many plausible mechanisms account fur the effect, and to ensure that undesirable toxic effects are not present. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available