4.5 Article

Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 5, Pages 1279-1284

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741279

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. We determined whether contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography can differentiate benign from malignant enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ninety-four enlarged lymph nodes in 39 adult patients (32 men and seven women; age range, 30-81 years) were examined with B-mode sonography and with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography. All patients had carcinoma of the oral cavity. Histologically, lymphadenitis was found in 57 nodes and metastases in 37 nodes. Geometric dimension, texture, and margin of the node and detection and location of vessels were noted. Histology and imaging findings were correlated. RESULTS. The transverse-to-longitudinal diameter ratio in combination with texture and margin analysis resulted in a correct diagnosis in only approximately 79% of the nodes. With contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography, 86% of nodes showed vessels, and 28% of nodes showed vessels with this technique exclusively. Characteristic configurations were identified: hilar vessels with branching indicated lymphadenitis (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 100%), and predominantly peripheral vessels indicated metastases (100%, 98%). These findings changed the diagnosis in 13 nodes, changed the therapy in four patients, and led to an incorrect diagnosis in one patient. CONCLUSION. Enlarged lymph nodes can be characterized as metastatic or inflammatory with high diagnostic accuracy on the basis of their vascular architecture as seen on contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available