4.4 Article

DNA topoisomerase II-alpha immunoreactivity as a marker of tumor aggressiveness in invasive breast cancer

Journal

PATHOBIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 137-143

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000055914

Keywords

breast cancer; prognosis; immunohistochemistry; topoisomerase II alpha; Ki-67; p53; c-erbB-2; bcl-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase (topo) II breaks and rejoins DNA strands; its isoform topo II alpha is associated with active cell proliferation of mammalian cells. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the expression of topo II alpha and biological behavior markers in breast cancer. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 88 samples of infiltrating breast cancer was immunohistochemically stained for topo II alpha. For each case, a topo II alpha index was determined by image analysis. Similar indexes were available for Ki-67 protein, a known cell proliferation marker, and p53, bcl-2 and c-erbB-2 oncoproteins. Each case had been staged and graded and the patients had been followed up for a mean period of 61.62 months. Results: Elevated topo II alpha immunopositivity (in >10% of malignant nuclei) was detected in 22 tumors, and this immunostatus was statistically associated with poor nuclear differentiation, absence of steroid hormone receptors, high Ki-67 immunoexpression, p53 protein accumulation and c-erbB-2 protein overexpression. Topo II alpha expression was not linked with disease extent (stage or lymph node status). Neither proliferation marker (topo II alpha or Ki-67) had any significant influence on the patients' recurrence-free survival. Conclusion: From the above results, we conclude that topo II alpha overexpression appears to be linked with cellular dedifferentiation and potentially aggressive tumor phenotype in invasive breast cancer. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available