4.3 Article

Level of fibronectin mRNA is markedly increased in human chronic wounds

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 447-451

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99281.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Acute wound healing has been extensively investigated over the years, however, little is known about possible healing defects in chronic wounds. Fibronectin (FN) plays a critical role in different phases of wound healing and has been demonstrated to be degraded in chronic wounds by proteases. Fibroblasts cultured from chronic leg ulcers showed a higher level of FN compared to normal fibroblasts. OBJECTIVE. We explored whether the increase in FN protein in chronic wounds is due to increased FN mRNA. In addition, the level of alpha(5)beta(1) integrin FN cell surface receptor was also examined. METHOD. Skin biopsies were taken from normal skin within a few hours of Mohs surgery and from the edge of chronic venous leg ulcers. In situ hybridization was performed to determine the level of FN mRNA. The level of integrin alpha(5)beta(1) was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS. The level of FN mRNA in normal skin and acute wounds was undetectable. In contrast, FN mRNA was heavily induced throughout the dermis of chronic wounds. Immunostaining using a monoclonal antibody against the alpha(5) subunit of integrin revealed that chronic wounds and normal skin showed undetectable levels of alpha(5)beta(1) integrin. A large induction of or, was observed in acute wounds. CONCLUSION. For reepithelization to occur, epidermal keratinocytes need to migrate over the wound surface, a process requiring an interaction between FN and its cell surface receptor integrin alpha(5)beta(1). These findings suggest that although FN mRNA is increased in chronic wounds, lack of FN cell surface receptor may prevent migration of epidermal keratinocytes in chronic wounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available