4.7 Article

Cellular radiosensitivity and complication risk after curative radiotherapy

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 173-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00173-0

Keywords

ionizing radiation; predictive tests; cellular radiosensitivity; breast cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To test for an association between in vitro fibroblast radiosensitivity and complication risk in a case-control study of breast cancer patients treated under standard conditions in a clinical trial of radiotherapy dose fractionation. Patients and methods: A cohort of patients participating in a randomised clinical trial of radiotherapy dose fractionation was selected on the basis of treatment-induced changes in the breast several years later. Thirty-nine cases with marked normal tissue changes were matched on several variables with 65 controls with no changes attributable to radiotherapy. Dermal fibroblast strains were established from duplicate skin biopsies, and clonogenic cell survival assays performed in triplicate after both high (similar to 1.6 Gy/min) and low (similar to 1 cGy/min) dose-rate irradiation. Laboratory studies were blind to patient identity, treatment outcome and radiotherapy schedule. Results: Analysis of 1128 clonogenic survival curves confirmed significant inter-patient variation in fibroblast radiosensitivity as measured by clonogenic survival. However, no association between fibroblast radiosensitivity and the development of late radiotherapy normal tissue effects was detected. Conclusions: Inter-individual variation in cellular radiosensitivity may not be the main determinant of complication risk in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. Other biological and technical factors may be more important in explaining the marked interpatient differences in normal tissue damage evident several years after curative radiotherapy. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available