4.4 Article

The distribution of abundance in neutral communities

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages 606-617

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/303345

Keywords

abundance; species diversity; biodiversity; species-area relationship; neutral model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The patterns of abundance generated by a simple stochastic birth-death-immigration model are described in order to characterize the diversity of neutral communities of ecologically equivalent species. Diversity is described by species number S and the variance of frequency or log abundance q(similar to). The frequency distribution of abundance is very generally lognormal, skewed to the left by immigration and resembling descriptions of natural communities. Increased immigration and community size always cause S to increase. Their effect on q(similar to) is more complicated, but given biologically reasonable assumptions, S and q(similar to) will be positively correlated in most circumstances. Larger samples contain more species; the graph of log S on log individuals, equivalent to a species-area curve, is generally convex upward but becomes linear with a slope of about +0.25 when immigration is low and births exceed deaths. When individuals invade a new, vacant environment, both S and q(similar to) increase through rime. Thus, a positive correlation between S and q(similar to) will usually be generated when sites of differing size or age are surveyed. At equilibrium, communities maintain roughly constant levels of S and q(similar to) but change in composition through time; composition may remain similar, however, for many generations. Many prominent patterns observed in natural communities can therefore be generated by a strictly neutral model. This does not show that community structure is determined exclusively by demographic stochasticity, but rather demonstrates the necessity for an appropriate null model when functional hypotheses are being tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available