3.8 Article

Minilaparoscopically assisted placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunts

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004640020017

Keywords

hydrocephalus; laparoscopy; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; minilaparoscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting remains the preferred treatment for hydrocephalus. Laparoscopic techniques to aid in the placement of the peritoneal portion of the catheter have been reported previously. We describe a minilaparoscopic VP shunt (MLVPS) insertion technique that facilitates directed placement of the peritoneal portion of the catheter in most patients, including those with obese abdomens previously subjected to surgery. In this study we review our experience with MLVPS placement. Methods: All cases of MLVPS insertions at the University of Kentucky Medical Center and Lexington WA Hospital performed between February 1998 and March 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 27 patients (13 males and 14 females) ranging in age from 4 to 81 years (mean, 41 years) underwent VP shunting. The MLVPS insertion was performed via a 2-mm laparoscope and a separate 2-mm incision for catheter insertion using a venous introducer kit. In patients who had prior abdominal surgery, a 5-mm direct-view trocar was used. Results: The MLVPS procedure was successful in 27 patients (100%). The mean number of prior shunts was 2 (range, 0-28). Of the 27 patients, 16 (59%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 76 min (range, 19-155 min). There were no intra- or postoperative complications, and no mortalities. The follow-up period extended from 1 to 12 months. Conclusions: Findings show MLVPS placement to be safe and feasible. It allows accurate, directed placement of the VP shunt with a 2-mm laparoscope and a second 2-mm incision for shunt insertion. The procedure is associated with reduced trauma to the abdominal wall and minimal postoperative ileus. Long-term follow-up assessment of shunt function is planned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available