4.4 Article

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormones, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and vasopressin on female sexual behavior

Journal

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 212-220

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1575

Keywords

stress; reproduction; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis; mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone; chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone-II; intracerebroventricular infusion

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH01349, MH11534] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35429] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion of four neuropeptides on female sexual behavior were examined in the female musk shrew (Suncus murinus). In the first experiment, (icv) infusion of 100 ng of the mammalian form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (mGnRH) facilitated rapid display of receptivity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-infused females had shorter latencies to rump present and tail wag, compared with controls. In a second experiment, icy administration of the other form of GnRH present in musk shrew brain, the chicken GnRH-II form, produced no changes in female behavior relative to the control condition. In Experiment 3, icy delivery of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) facilitated female sexual behavior, relative to vasopressin and controls. The females treated with CRH had shorter latencies to display rump present, tail wag, and for the receipt of the first missed intromission compared with females in the other treatment groups. Vasopressin increased female scent marking relative to that of CRH-treated females. These data indicate that neurohormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes can facilitate reproductive behavior in S.murinus. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available