3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Hypothyroidism after treatment for nonthyroid head and neck cancer

Journal

ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
Volume 126, Issue 5, Pages 652-657

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.5.652

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [2P30CA16058] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the incidence of posttreatment hypothyroidism in patients treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy for advanced-stage nonthyroid head and neck cancer and to make recommendations for its detection. Design: A prospective study to assess the incidence and time frame of occurrence of hypothyroidism in patients by primary tumor site and treatment modality. Thyroid function tests were performed preoperatively, at the first postoperative visit, and then approximately every 6 months. Patients were followed up for up to 3 years. Setting: Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio. Patients: A total of 251 patients with nonthyroid head and neck cancer were originally enrolled; 198 patients with evaluable data were studied to determine the incidence of posttreatment hypothyroidism. Approximately 80% of the patients had advanced stage (III or IV) Or recurrent cancer. Results: The overall incidence of posttreatment hypothyroidism was 15% in 198 patients followed up for a mean of approximately 12 months. Hypothyroidism developed in 12% of patients treated with nonlaryngeal surgery and radiotherapy. The group undergoing total laryngectomy (with thyroid lobectomy) and radiotherapy had a 61% incidence of hypothyroidism. The average time to detection of hypothyroidism was 8.2 months. Conclusions: Approximately 15% of patients treated for advanced head and neck cancer with surgery and radiotherapy mill develop hypothyroidism. Those treated with total laryngectomy and radiotherapy are at greatest risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available