4.8 Article

Increased incidence of HFE C282Y mutations in patients, with iron overload and hepatocellular carcinoma developed in non-cirrhotic liver

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 805-811

Publisher

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80250-0

Keywords

C282Y gene mutations; hepatocellular carcinoma; HFE gene mutations; non-cirrhotic liver

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Histological and biochemical iron overload has been reported in non-tumoral liver of most patients presenting an hepatocellular carcinoma HCC) developed in non-cirrhotic liver (NCL), The aim of our study was to investigate HFE mutations in patients with HCC in NCL, Methods: Thirty-five patients with HCC in NCL were included either retrospectively or prospectively, Clinical data, iron and viral status, and HFE gene mutations were compared between groups with (I+, n=19) or without histological iron overload (I-, n=16), Results: Twenty per cent of patients were HBV or HCV positive. Fifty-four per cent had hepatocytic iron overload at histology, Mean hepatic iron concentration was 100.2+/-14.6 mu mol/g in I+ versus 23.2+/-2.1 mu mol/g in I- (p<0.001). Among the 19 I+ patients, eight mutations were found: two C282Y/C282Y, three C282Y/WT, two C282Y/H63D and one H63D/H63D. None of these mutations was found in the I- group. There was no significant difference concerning the H63D heterozygous mutation between I+ or I- patients, Conclusions: In patients with HCC in NCL, HBV and HCV markers are rare (20%), and mild iron overload is frequent (54%), In patients with HCC in NCL and iron overload, C282Y mutations are frequent (36.8% of cases) and significantly increased (p<0.009) compared to HCC in NCL without iron overload; these mutations are mostly heterozygous. H63D heterozygosity is not associated with liver iron overload. Because of the small size of the series, HFE C282Y mutation should be investigated on a larger scale in patients with HCC in NCL with iron overload in order to confirm this association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available