4.6 Article

Evaluation of the environmental impact of microbial aerosols generated by wastewater treatment plants utilizing different aeration systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages 845-852

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01024.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using three sampler devices (SAS, Andersen Six-Stages and All Glass Impinger), the environmental impact of bacterial and fungal aerosols generated by municipal wastewater treatment plants operating with different methods of sludge oxygenation were evaluated. The highest microbial concentrations were recovered above the tanks (2247 cfu m(-3)) and in downwind positions (1425 cfu m(-3)), where a linear correlation (P < 0.05) was found between the quantity of sewage treated and the entities of microbial aerosol dispersion. Moreover, an exponential increase (P < 0.05) in the bacteria recovered from the air occurred at increasing times of treatment. However, after long-term plant operation, high bacterial and fungal concentrations were found in almost all of the sites around the plant. Coliforms, enterococci, Escherichia coli and staphylococci were almost always recovered in downwind positions. Considerable fractions (20-40%) of sampled bacteria were able to penetrate the final stages of the Andersen apparatus and thus, are likely to be able to penetrate the lungs. The plant operating with a fine bubble diffused air system instead was found to generate rather low concentrations of bacteria and fungi; moreover, staphylococci and indicator micro-organisms were almost absent. Finally, salmonellae, Shigella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aeromonas spp, were not detected in either of the plants. The results indicate a remarkable dispersion of airborne bacteria and fungi from tanks in which oxygen is supplied via a mechanical agitation of sludge, and suggest the need to convert them to diffused aeration systems which pose a lesser hazard for human health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available