4.4 Article

Effects of copper and zinc on growth, feeding and oxygen consumption of Farfantepenaeus paulensis postlarvae (Decapoda: Penaeidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 247, Issue 2, Pages 233-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00152-0

Keywords

shrimp; copper; zinc; antagonism; food consumption; oxygen consumption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of chronic exposure (35 days) to sub-lethal concentrations of copper (17-212 ppb) and zinc (41-525 ppb) on growth of Farfantepenaeus paulensis postlarvae 17 days old (PL17) was analysed. The effects of acute exposure of PL17 to the same metal on food ingestion and oxygen consumption were also evaluated. Studies were performed using copper and zinc singly, and in a mixture of equipotent concentrations (1:2.5). Chronic exposure to copper (85 and 212 ppb and zinc (106, 212 and 525 ppb) reduced PL17 growth. Acute exposure to copper (212 ppb) and zinc (525 ppb) reduced the number of Artemia sp. predated during 30 min and the positive feeding response induced by L-isoleucine. Despite of the lower positive feeding response when PL17 were exposed to zinc, a significant difference from control condition was not seen. Oxygen consumption was reduced by all copper and zinc concentrations tested. The mean reduction was approximately 32%. The copper zinc-mixture did not modify food consumption and feeding response, or the oxygen consumption of the PL17. The inhibition of food and oxygen consumption induced by copper and zinc could explain, at least in part, the long-term reduction of growth observed in chronically exposed PL17. Our results also suggest that the inhibition of food consumption induced by copper is possibly due to an effect on chemosensory mechanisms. Finally, an antagonism between copper and zinc was observed, when were employed to analyse feeding behaviour and aerobic metabolism after acute exposure. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available